Processing math: 30%
Google
 
Web unafbapune.blogspot.com

Sunday, December 30, 2012

 

Ex 1.26 kn

Let n and k be positive integers, and suppose xk=n for some xQ. Show that xZ. In other words, kn is either an integer or is irrational.





== Attempt ==

Suppose xQ,
  x=st such that gcd(s,t)=1 for some sZ and tNn=xk=(st)ksk=ntk
which means nsk.

For each prime p, we may define the function vp, mapping non-zero integers to non-negative integers, as follows: for every integer n0, if n=pem, where p, then ν_p(n) := e. We may then write the factorization of n into primes as
  \begin{aligned} n &= \pm \prod_{p}p^{v_p(n)} \text{ where the product is over all primes }p \end{aligned}
From s^k = n \cdot t^k,
  \begin{aligned} \pm \prod_{p}p^{k \cdot v_p(s)} = \pm \prod_{p}p^{v_p(n)} \prod_{p}p^{k \cdot v_p(t)} \\ \end{aligned}
Observe that n \mid s^k \iff v_p(n) \le v_p(s^k) \equiv k \cdot v_p(s) for all primes p. Thus,
  \begin{aligned} \prod_{p}p^{k \cdot v_p(s) - v_p(n)} &= \prod_{p}p^{k \cdot v_p(t)} \\ \end{aligned}
which shows that if k \cdot v_p(s) - v_p(n) > 0 for some prime p, p must be a factor of both s and t. But this contradicts the fact that gcd(s, t) = 1. So the supposition x \in \mathbb{Q} must be false, or x (ie \sqrt[k]{n}) must be irrational in such case. On the other hand, if k \cdot v_p(s) - v_p(n) = 0 for all prime p, t would necessarily be equal to 1, which means x (ie \sqrt[k]{n}) must be an integer in such case.

\Box


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?